The association heartfelt thanks to Don Mario for the hospitality and willingness in the organization of the Assembly at the Hall of Borghetto community.
recorded interview with Dominic Finiguerra
intervention of the representatives of the Committee of Protection of Health and Environment of Vallesina
Press Gloria Anna Sordoni - Mayor Candidate - Lista Civica "Together for Monte San Vito"
Intervention Sabrina Sartini - Mayor Candidate List Democrats and Reformists
Debate
------------------------------------------- A CONCLUSION -------------------
First, a heartfelt thanks to all those who spoke to the assembly last Friday, Don Mario, who gave us the room and borne with patience till late at night, to those who have made technically possible and especially to the speakers, Andrea and Domenico Bertaglia Finiguerra.
The deplorable "verbal brawl" inter alia, a theme not central to the assembly, forced us to close abruptly and has deprived us of the opportunity to take stock of the evening, delighted with the forum to do so.
reiterate that even before that in mind our specific intention was to say with absolute clarity to our desire to reclaim the right to intervene in decisions that affect us as citizens, voters and taxpayers, before these are taken over our heads and without our knowledge. We want citizens to be conscious of and sympathetic to what happens to us and vivereMONTESANVITO will work in every way to make this not only possible but normal.
With the assembly on Friday, as well as to clearly hear our voice, we wanted to appeal to all - present and not - for help on the matter "exit MMarciano" but also to demand transparency and shared by those institutions that represent us to do or say.
Ms. Sartini in his speech a few minutes for us to show an official document of the province from which we could verify that the proposed resolution of the viability of low vallesina we have shown actually corresponds to that on the table, the same Sartini has promised to get us that document as soon as possible so that we can take complete vision, we hope that this will happen soon.
The letter of the provincial council - which is not our position and was mentioned only to reinforce the concept of lack of information - has been successfully shown for what it is:
a letter that some provincial councilors have posted December 20 last year, the chairman of the council and the provincial councils and their colleagues claim to be unaware of their own decisions regarding the "exit affair" decisions, they say, taken in non-institutional locations.
More specifically referring to those directors meetings parallel to the technical meetings of the province (which does not seem to have been prepared under the records) promoted by the President of the Council Committee Planning Raffaeli within the PD.
With regard to the fact that one of the signatories would be driven by desire for revenge over the refusal of a shopping center in Camerata, it seems unreasonable given that the hypothesis requires that we have shown that very mall.
About copianificazione to be carried out by the provincial there arises a doubt, we hope there who can clarify it.
If a person called to ratify it freezes what happens? The prg individual municipalities are blocked as a result, or everyone goes for their own account? It is easy to imagine that in this case is a very weak copianificazione that every breath of wind may blow away. Similarly, it is difficult to understand how we can accept - according to copianificazione - to divide the honors when the charges are all on one side.
In the specific case of what we have defined summarily "North Ring of Clairvaux 'understandable reaction of a monsanvitese would be:
" but how! Now that they have finished Chiaravallesi squander their territory with a wicked urban policy, the claim to have it ring from us?!? Are the directors of Clairvaux to assume their responsibilities to their citizens. We have already had to endure a MSVito - outside of our company. port - their landfill!
Returning to the "question of toll" seems to us that just the realization of this work is the keystone of the entire proposed plan for the reorganization of the road.
La ns. question is that? But what is the practical realization of this new toll only 5 miles to the north of AN? What the project envisages? Certainly not what we were shown here Friday night because - as we were told - we are still far from a conclusion and the work of the third lane is already in Senigallia. Or there is one very precent or the Province is huge and improper delay.
The question of the financing plan is also not at all marginal or consequential on the establishment of a project, because the possibility to raise the funds may have a direct bearing on the structure of the plan. Explaining with a trivial example: If I have money in my pocket, I can decide where and what to eat but if I intend to invite me to at least the choice of restaurant I have to leave to others.
Our opinion in general terms that we have seen is absolutely negative because it is simply the repetition of old models and now they can not solve the current problems. In other words, the solution traffic is not a new road.
Andrea Bertaglia has clearly said that the new challenge is to reduce the problem and not the application of a buffer solution. To do so does not need to invent new solutions, we are in the comfortable situation of being able to observe the possible our future simply by looking at the solutions adopted in other parts of the world to evaluate the results. There is enough to avoid the mistakes made elsewhere and to follow good examples, this is common sense, let's use.
A final aspect that has not been addressed at the meeting but that it is strategically important, the continued consumption of fertile land puts us in a position to make employees abroad for agricultural products. After the energy dependence we also want the food?
We need administrators who can guide us in the future, those who want to keep us in the past for negligence or worse, we no longer know who farcene.
0 comments:
Post a Comment