Low Vallesina and congestion: what's in store?
There is no doubt that the focus on the topic is growing every day, and the thing that motivates us directly from this page. The argument has long stationed in the local press, without interest, however, must be waning. Indeed, applications not only increase ... after all, this happens in our forum , who became a mirror of a strong need for information.
There truly a co-planned infrastructure plan? What does? Someone knows something? We hear of heavy problems associated with the new motorway junction Gabella (Montemarciano) as well as project ideas already in development . Let's make things clear, first starting from the road this framework, where the exits Ancona Nord (A14) and Clairvaux (SS76; road marked in orange in map) are the main reference grid, with particular criticism of tract that connects the road Sirolo-Senigallia (SP2; in blue on the map), segment, this, including the director Clairvaux-Castelferretti (SP33) and shown yellow on the map. Many (a real mess) are the roads going to come together on this stretch, connecting axes that are impacted on the one hand, the towns of Monte San Vito and Claire, and secondly, the Chamber Picena , garfish, Polverigi and Osimo. Fully congested traffic, in this context, is the lifeblood of connection that joins Claire and Plan of Camerata Picena toll dell'A14 (the same fate, after all, affects the same town of Clairvaux).
Now on the other hand, the project ideas that would be in the works, and on the road mapped out based on it: everything revolves around a new release of SS76, thought in Piano di Camerata Picena (as per Master Plan of the same municipality). The realization of that output would be in line for a fast connection in direction of Clairvaux, with an artery that moves from the new junction to the industrial area of \u200b\u200bMonte San Vito, leaving the center Chiaravallesi (therefore lighter in terms of traffic). At this point, we put together two elements, namely the release of the Plains of Picena Camerata and the new proposal can North Freeway of Clairvaux : thanks to the former, the latter would get continuity, facilitating both the link with the A14 (in green on the map), and (in hindsight) the use of the new toll Gabella. The union of these two components ensures that this bypass has until the appropriate extension SS76, and prevents channeling traffic axis Clairvaux-Jesi (SP76; in blue on the map) in the absence of these conditions, in fact, it would block vehicular traffic at the entrance the town of Clairvaux.
So back to the toll Gabella, formulating a hypothesis at this point arises: what it would mean the Link to this box without going through SP76 Clairvaux (but bypassing the center from the south side) but also providing an outlet for Jesi? The answer, on the assumption existing project, means a (worrying) thing: the road crossing the area monsanvitese , namely, the creation of a director near Le Cozze , drawn in red in the scheme that we propose (in fact, a line that breaks between the mussels and Borghetto ) . This explains, then, attention increasingly focusing on the theme. This explains, in particular, impacting the scope of the risks facing Monte San Vito. If this is the danger that runs on our territory, if this is the picture that time is composing, because just now we hear about it? What happened to the transparency of decisions, especially in such important decisions?
Not wanting to make any unfounded alarmism, but always trying to maintain a high level of awareness of these issues, we very much hope that the various political leaders denied the rumors, and our hypothesis.
Clearly, happen if instead of what we expected, we will always continue to fight because the logics are planning a few times but not the interest of a better quality of life of our citizens.
read all about lasveja.blogspot.com 
0 comments:
Post a Comment