Thursday, October 25, 2007

What Is Pay For Ccie In 2011 In Dubai

Democracy and religion EZIO MAURO

"Let's stop." With this invitation an order recalling the Cardinal Secretary of State of the Holy See Tarcisio Bertone yesterday took a public stand against the Republic of investigation on the cost of the Church for Italian taxpayers, signed by Curzio Maltese. "Down with this story of funds to the Church - Cardinal Bertone said literally - through the opening to the faith in God only brings fruits to the company." He then added: "There is a newspaper every week to pull off such initiatives. Religious education is sacrosanct. "

We intend to holiness, so we do not answer this point. But we can not fail to notice that the tone used by His Eminence is mandatory and is unusual in any democracy is best for a Syllabus. The attack on the Vatican about a journalistic inquiry that examines the costs of Italian citizens for the Catholic Church, from tax exemptions through eight per thousand in funding for private schools, at the hour of religion: the other episodes will follow, until the work plan is not finalized.

Let's stop? And why? Who decides? In the name of what authority? Maybe the Holy See believes that it can block the work of a free newspaper to his liking? He thinks he can decide whether an investigation should be published "weekly" or with a different cadence? E 'convinced just ask that the early closure of a press to prevent them from discussing the "story"? Finally and most importantly: there is no more the imprimatur, so even in Italy, if a newspaper thinks "come up with initiatives of this kind" can do it. Without committing an error that we will be happy to correct, if we receive requests for corrections that have not arrived, because no substantial point of the investigative work has been disproved.


The refutation, it seems, even if it is incredible to say, about the very legitimacy of addressing these issues. As if there were, we said, an unprecedented journalistic servitude Italy to the Holy See, is not provided for other Italian and foreign institutions, but typically only non-democratic countries. In addition, His Eminence is the head of government of a foreign state that requests to "finish" with the free labor of investigation (of course debatable, but free) to an Italian newspaper. Should know that the West does not use. Never.

this reaction is surprising when we speak not of the foundations of faith, but of money. Yet if the Church - as it should - want to play a full part of public discourse in a democratic and transparent, can not then escape in the name of some sacred subject to the obligations that this entails public discourse: for all subjects, even those devoted to the good common. This is also a perennial part of the challenge, and contemporary, between democracy and religion. (October 25, 2007

Saturday, October 20, 2007

Best Vintage Receiver Ever

the primaries of the Democratic Party? An example of a democracy. And now??

On October 14 I was lucky enough to have been one of the many volunteers who contributed to the smooth functioning of the Primary confirmed that the leadership of Walter Veltroni at the helm of this "new" political party. I do not why do big illusions to make a new party should be reciprocated the ruling class, people are more or less the same, this does not mean giving an opinion that is negative or positive about it. Despite everything I still keep some hope knowing that I that are an integral part of this process that we hope to be democratic not only in name but also in reality.
must first start immediately, and do so from the territory, area, dodging practice that 'anti-politics "(which is not anti-political, but rather a legitimate reaction of the square) with proposals that are not only proclaimed but put into practice. Discuss this course, but then decided to act. Federalism and political ethics (see also reducing waste and eliminating the privileges), these are two key points at which the PD must provide answers immediately. It is important that we remain united young people, with ideas that can be accepted, ending up on the idealistic principles of reasoning, but giving a response to criticisms that come from outside. Also on Environment, Another key issue that is discussed here in Romagna movements claiming to be unrelated to the traditional parties.
And it's important, I repeat, that the Democratic Party is not only in name but in fact this name is not a smokescreen in order to retain certain interests in Bologna (both right and left). Should therefore have no taboos about what not to confront and rectify popular accepting the "risk" to place a democratic form in the hands of the citizens to know how to really think about certain specific issues.
Go ahead, And let's view.

Sunday, October 7, 2007

Tickling Female Female



Here is the article of the Republic a few days ago .. if you missed it take a look!

of Curzio Maltese


"When I came to CEI in 1986, there were barely enough money to pay the salaries of four employees." Camillo Ruini does not exaggerate. In the mid-eighties, the Vatican's finances are an empty box and black. One year after the arrival of the CEI Ruini, only the Vatican passport save the president of the IOR, Archbishop Paul Marcinkus, for crack arrest of Roberto Calvi of Banco Ambrosiano. The economic crisis is the reason why John Paul II in Rome called the young Bishop of Reggio Emilia, then known only to the news for having celebrated the marriage of Flavia Franzoni and Romano Prodi, but endowed with managerial talent. Few choices will prove to be more appropriate. In the "twenty years Ruini, the president and secretary from 86 to '91, the IEC has developed into an economic power, and media and politics. In parallel, the chairman of the bishops has assumed a central role in public debate within the Vatican and Italian, as never before with its predecessors, to become the great elector of Benedict XVI. The reasons for the rise of
Ruini related to intelligence, the iron will and extraordinary as an organizer of the character. But another key to read the parable is called "eight per thousand." A river of money begins to flow into the coffers of Cei the spring of 1990, when it comes to taking direct sull'Irpef regime, and now flows into the sea of \u200b\u200ba billion euro a year. Ruini is its undisputed dominus. Removed the automatic costs as the salaries of priests, is the chairman of the bishops' conference, through a few trusted associates, who had the last word on every single expense, the repair of a canonical construction of a mission in Africa for investment property and financial .

from eight per thousand, the most famous item, the investigation part of the Republic cost of the Catholic church for the Italians. The calculation is not simple, as well as unfashionable. Much less fashionable of angry diatribes on the cost of the policy. The "price of caste" is now calculated in four billion euro a year. "Half a financial" to "to feed the political class." "The equivalent of a bridge over the Straits of a Moses or a year."

the figure of the scandal, slammed on the cover of The World and other newspapers in the wake of the chastity of Rizzo and Stella and the cost of democracy and of Salvi Villone, we get by adding up the salaries of 150 thousand elected by the people, parliamentarians Europe's top adviser to the mountain communities, plus the fees of almost three hundred thousand consultants, the costs for the operation of ministries, the pensions of politicians, the electoral reimbursements, funding for the party newspaper, the blue car and other privileges, including refreshment stands and barber of Deputies.

for a level playing field should be adopted "the cost of the Church" the same open-mindedness. But one would arrive at the approximate Pharaonic figures, such trumpeted in pamphlets and in some sites anticlerical.

With more prudence and realism can be established that the Catholic Church in any case costs taxpayers as much as the Italian political class. Over four billion euro per year, including direct financing State and local governments and non-tax revenue. The first item consists of the eight billion euro per thousand, 650 million for the salaries of 22 000 time teachers of religion ("An old wreck concordat that would be eliminated" in the opinion of the Catholic writer Vittorio Messori) , another 700 million paid by State and local authorities for the conventions on education and healthcare. Then there is the voice of variable funding to important events, like Jubilee (3500 billion lire) at the last meeting of Loreto (2.5 million euro), for an annual average over the past decade, 250 million. These two billion 600 million of direct contributions to the Church should be added to a combination of tax advantages granted to Vatican, now at the center of an investigation by the EU "state aid". The list is huge, national and local levels. Always with caution can be estimated in a range between 400 to 700 million for failure to collect the ICI (estimated non-market "of the Association of Municipalities), 500 million in exemptions from IRAP, IRES and other charges, in other 600 million tax avoidance legalized the Catholic world of tourism, which runs every year for Italy and a flow of forty million visitors and pilgrims. The total exceeds four billion per year, thus a financial tool, a bridge over the Strait or Mose year, more than a few tens of millions.

The Catholic Church, not elected by the people and not subject to democratic constraints, coast Italians as the political system. Only the Italians, at least in this size. Not the French, Spaniards, Germans, Americans, like us who also pay the "cost of democracy", perhaps with better results.

It can be argued that the Italians are happier to give money to politicians to priests who do not, in fact much less complain about it. In part perhaps because they do not know. The mechanism of eight per thousand sull'Irpef, studied in the mid-eighties by an accountant at the time "left" as Giulio Tremonti, Craxi government consultant, assigned to the Catholic Church also donations not expressed on a percentage basis. 60 percent of taxpayers leave blank the "eight per thousand" but thanks to 35 percent indicating "Catholic Church" among the permitted choices (the others were, Waldensians, Adventists, Assemblies of God, Jews and Lutherans) , the CEI grabs nearly 90 percent of the total. A judicial monstrosity called the 84 already on the Sole 24 Ore historian Piero Bellini.

But even considering the mechanism of "facilitating" eight per thousand, is a widespread belief that money to the Church are well designed, with a broad "social return". Half a financial agreement, but helpful to repay the valuable work done by the priests in the area, the daily effort of the parishes plug the gap in welfare increasingly evident, not to mention the efforts in the Third World. All real arguments. But "how much" real?

Coping in the pocket to the Vatican is desperate enterprise. But to understand where does the money while the Italians will be allowed to quote the same suspicion as the source CEI and its annual budget for the eighth thousand. Five euro of taxpayers' money, the conference of bishops said of spending for operations of a charity in Italy and abroad (respectively 12 and 8 percent of the total). € The other four are self-financing. Taken 35 percent of the total to pay salaries to about 39 000 Italian priests, is half a billion euro each year that the CEI Summit distributes within the Church in its sole opinion, without any serious control, under general headings such as "needs of worship," "costs of catechesis, financial assets and real estate . Not to mention another paradox: if the "vote" eight per thousand was applied to half of the quorum, the Church would never see a euro.

Catholic culture, to an extent far greater than in cultures timid liberal and leftist, has been ongoing for years, a courageous, painful and censored debate on the "how" the Vatican hierarchy use the money eight per thousand "and to truncate quell dissent in the Church. "One of the best examples is the pamphlet" church lady "by Roberto Beretta, writer and journalist of the future, the bishops' newspaper. Under the heading" The other side of eight per thousand ", Beretta observes:" Who manages the money of eight per thousand won an enormous power, which also has important implications ecclesial and theological. "He continues:" As a bishop for example - knowing that she will have to use the CEI for the money to arrange a workshop or repair Cathedral - never raise his hand in a general meeting to challenge the positions of president? "." And in fact - the author claims - only that in Italy you can talk frankly are some of the bishops emeritus, that those now retired, who have nothing to lose ...".

A scroll through records of cultural conferences and the pages of "Church lady", completely rejected the Catholic and received from publishing religious bookstores, we understand that the criticism of the "direct" and use "ideological" eight per thousand of the universe is not at all believers. Of course, there are "retired bishops", by Carlo Maria Martini, now self-imposed exile in Jerusalem , Giuseppe Casale, former archbishop of Foggia, which describes the new course: "The bishops no longer speak, waiting for input from the top ... When they consult all the appointments of bishops, lay people, priests, Monsignor, and then do what they want, that is, anyone except the name that was specified. "The above-mentioned Vittorio Messori has complained on several occasions" the blimp "," centralism "and" the dominance achieved by the bureaucracy in the Church ". Alfredo Carlo Moro, a lawyer and brother of Aldo, in a recent government intervention has launched a painful accusation:" We see now a serious shortage of debate in the Church, an impressive and resounding silence of the meetings of the CEI is known only what the president said in the beginning, the theologians speak only when they are perfectly in line, otherwise remain silent. "

The church of twenty years ago, Camillo Ruini, one in which he began his ascent, he has no money to pay employees of the CEI, with finances shaken by scandal and drained by the support of Solidarity. Catholic culture feels ridiculed by the hegemony of the left, ignored by secular newspapers, expelled from the world of commercial TV hedonistic, even reduced to minority in Rai reformed. Yet it is a church still alive, even lively. To accommodate both pluralist in its bosom a thousand voices, the liberation theologians to the ultra-traditionalist followers of Archbishop Lefebrve. Able to recognize the mass movement, as Communion and Liberation, and "discover" the mafia, with the homilies of Cardinal Pappalardo, the work of Don Puglisi to Brancaccio, commitment Don Italy Calabria against the 'Ndrangheta.
After twenty years of care Ruini "the Church seemingly bursting with health. It is far more rich and powerful and played at the Palace, ruling the media agenda and affects the overall policy framework, by An in PRC, not just on one. In television appearances is second only to the clergy political class. They boast huge crowds at rallies Catholics, the multiplication of saints and shrines, the record audience of religious-themed fiction. The dissenting voices have disappeared. Yet churches and vestries are emptied, the crisis of vocations in two decades has reduced from 60 to 39 thousand priests, the religious sacraments like marriage and baptism are decreasing.
The clergy is the victim
dell'illusoria media equation "Visibility equals consent," as his twin separated, the political class. In real life, indeed the danger of terrible prophecy launched thirty years ago by a progressive theologian: "The Church is becoming for many the main obstacle to faith. They can no longer see it as nothing more than the human ambition of power, the little theater of men who, with their claim to administer the official Christianity, seem mostly to hinder the true spirit of Christianity. " That theologian named Joseph Ratzinger.

(Contributors Pontesilli Carlo and Maurizio Turkish)

Saturday, October 6, 2007

Pto Volunteer Appreciation Bolgs

open letter from Salvatore Borsellino - Case De Magistris

open letter from Salvatore Borsellino

Mastella I want to thank the Minister for his initiative to request the removal of Judge De environmental incompatibility Magistris by the prosecutor in Catanzaro.
I want to thank him publicly because I was now convinced that as a result of campaigns to discredit and aggression of any kind against Judiciary of the people had become accustomed to the arrogance and impunity of politicians and had accepted this as normal and inevitable state of affairs.
Now, the reaction provoked by this initiative in public opinion, the common people, a reaction that is causing throughout Italy collecting signatures and spontaneous demonstrations, especially by young people, support the Magistrate that he may continue his work without intimidation and interference outside, he kindled the hope that things can still change.
I signed with Sonia Alfano a letter to the Head of State where we ask that protects, as is his job, recommending that the independence of the Judiciary CSM, which he chairs, to reject the request of the Minister. And ask him instead of dealing with others and far more serious problems of justice, as the case of the Prosecutor of Caltanissetta, where are concentrated the most serious investigation of the facts of our recent history, such as on the murder investigation of the massacre outside of D ' Amelio red and investigation into the disappearance of the agenda of Paul, that is, from July 12, 2006, left without a guide and entrusted to a regent.
But I would hope that Mr. Minister spontaneously take note of the environmental situation of incompatibility that has developed between himself and the majority of Italians and a desire to implement his intention to resign, About threatened several times, but so far only for the purpose of blackmail against the majority government.
Mr. Mastella often likes to repeat to be an honest person, should not fear that the ongoing investigations by the judge De Magistris may affect his person, could involve up to his friends or people with whom he entertained or entertain some kind of relationship, perhaps not always clear.
should indeed be grateful to Judge De Magistris that its investigation would demonstrate the honesty of Mr. Minister given a license to behave with integrity certified that this would have more value for its claims that, in the public eye, can only be biased and therefore not objective or even suspicious.
but I would not insist too much on his person at the risk of point to it as a convenient scapegoat for many ills of Italian politics, as Beppe Grillo said with an irony that Mr. Mastella was not able to understand and that all the national press has been pretending not to understand by publishing headlines around the pretense of peace between the political and the comic, and here I leave to your opinion and decide who is the politician who the comic, and then releasing only a few short article barely visible when Beppe Grillo has clarified the true intentions of the trap in which he had dropped.
The fact is, signor Mastella, that someone like Grillo, who yesterday made being a professional comedian, is now one of the few who do politics in a serious way, and those who have been designated by the parties to make Italian politicians and people, in the absence of other choices, he had to vote today rush all the way to play the part of the comedians in this cabaret, low alloy, which has become the policy in Italy.
But the scenario, unfortunately, is not a cabaret, is a tragedy, the tragedy of a country in disarray, where the balance of government stand on cross-blackmail and where the opposition is longing to the suicide of government to take over the exercise of power, start to adopt "ad personam" laws "and continue, as it has done also this government, implementation of that infamous pact between the state and the Mafia for the power-sharing and procurement in Italy for which it was necessary to eliminate Paolo Borsellino.
And unfortunately I see many, too many similarities between the events of yesterday and today. Today, Paolo Borsellino and Giovanni Falcone are held up as heroes, and after killing them, is still trying to bury them by dint of memorials, plaques and street signs, as if to reassure themselves that they are really dead, but yesterday, when they were on the verge to arrive at the focal point in their investigations of the relationship between mafia and politics, they tried in every way to hinder the work, to isolate them, to force them to move to other place to be able to find space to continue their investigations. Even
De Magistris was embarrassed by his boss, De Magistris also has been isolated, De Magistris is also seeking to transfer to make it harmless, but remember, Mr. Minister, that past experience, the isolation of a court or an investigator was always the first step to point out to the vengeance of the Mafia and the Camorra, one at the beginning and determines this state of affairs has less responsibility, at least moral , who shall decide on the disposal or press the button on a timer.
But remember that people would not support that history repeats itself, the same people in the Cathedral of Palermo kicked and slapped those politicians who wanted to sit in the front row in front of the coffins of the children of Paul, they pushed the same way by a Parliament in which sit side by side with people under investigation, prescribed or convicted in the first instance and this time we can recycle under other names and new parties, to maintain power and occupy unworthily institutions like you did after the breakup of the First Republic.

Salvatore Borsellino

see yourself to have the link to an interesting interview with De Magistris:

http://www .youtube.com / watch? v = pQt0PdNNWeg